Activating the person in the changing situation
A dynamic analytical approach to labour activation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31265/jcsw.v16i1.373Keywords:
labour activation, social work, person-in-the-situation, change, subjective experience, service users’ meaning makingAbstract
For several decades, the turn towards labour activation has dominated European social work and social work institutions. While social work research and practice focused on labour activation have long considered “the person in the situation”, exploring the service users’ experiences at specific moments and contexts in time, we argue that labour activation is an ongoing process involving a complex interplay of factors (structural, social, personal), and that these are shaped by changes and ruptures throughout a person’s life course. Furthermore, the changing situation is not an objective fact, though its meaning is actively constructed by the service user. Asking how participants in a labour activation programme subjectively make meaning of their activation experiences, with reference to changing personal histories and institutional encounters over time, we shift the focus from social work’s emphasis on “the person in the situation”, and we open the concept to include “the person in the changing situation” to help enable a more dynamic analysis of the activation process. The concept accounts for the interaction between subjective meaning making and institutional structures and offers, as these change over time. The study is based on fieldwork in the Norwegian labour and welfare services (NAV). We present three participants in the Norwegian Qualification Programme as illustrative cases, each with distinct profiles, to illustrate how service users actively refer to changing situations – as these are shaped by time, biography and institutional movement – when making meaning of their labour activation experiences. The findings have implications for social work research and practice, as matters of biography, timing and life course trajectories must be accounted for to gain a more accurate picture of the labour activation experience. A consideration of institutional and life course change also offers a better professional understanding of the complexity of lived experiences when working with service users, potentially enabling a more effective practice.
References
Born, A. & Jensen, P. (2010). Dialouge-based activation – a new ‘Dispositive’? International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 30(5/6), 326-336. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443331011054271.
Bruner, E.M. (1986) ‘Experience and its Expressions’, in V. W. Turner & Bruner, E. M. (Ed.) The Anthropology of Experience (p. 3–30). University of Illinois Press.
Caswell, D., Eskelinen, L. & Olesen, S. P. (2013). Identity work and client resistance underneath the canopy of active employment policy. Qualitative Social Work, 12(1), 8–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325011413629
Caswell, D. & Innjord, A. K. (2011). The Norwegian labour and welfare administration – is it compatible with a logic of inclusion? Tidsskrift for velferdsforskning, 14(1), 38-50.
Cornell, K. (2006). Person-in-situation: History, theory, and new directions for social work. Praxis, 6, 50-57.
Dahl, E. (2003). Does ‘workfare’ work? The Norwegian experiences. International Journal of Social Welfare, 12, 274–288. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9671.00282
Danneris, S. (2018). Ready to work (yet)? Unemployment trajectories among vulnerable welfare recipients. Qualitative Social Work, 17(3), 355-372. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325016672916
Danneris, S. & Nielsen, M. H. (2018). Bringing the client back in: A comparison between political rationality and the experiences of the unemployed. Social Policy Administration, 52, 1441-1454. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12386
Eastmond, M. (2007). Stories as lived experience: Narratives in forced migration research. Journal of Refugee Studies 20(2): 248-264. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/fem007
Fjeldheim, S., Engebretsen, E. & Levin, I. (2015) The theoretical foundation of social case work. Nordic Social Work Research, 5, 42-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2015.1067900
Friberg, J.H. & Elgvin, O. (2016). Når velferdsstaten bryter tilliten ned: Somaliske innvandrere i møte med NAV. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning, 56(03), 257-284. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.1504-291X-2016-03-02
Gardner, A. (2014). Personalisation - where did it come from? In A. Gardner, J. Parker & G. Bradley (Ed.) Transforming Social Work Practice Series: Personalisation in social work. SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473922471.n1
Gjersøe, H. M. (2020). Frontline provision of integrated welfare and employment services: Organising for activation competency. International Journal of Social Welfare 30(3), 280-290. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/ijsw.12464
Gubrium, E. (2014). Participant meaning-making along the work trajectory of a labour activation programme. In J. F. Gubrium & M. Järvinen (Ed.), Turning Troubles into Problems: Clientization in Human Services (p. 137-154). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203798010
Gubrium, E., Harsløf, I. & Lødemel, I. (2014). Norwegian activation reform on a wave of wider welfare state change. In I. Lødemel & A. Moreira (Ed.), Activation or Workfare: Governance and the Neo-liberal Convergence (p. 19-46). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199773589.003.0002
Gubrium, E. & Hansen, H.C. (2019). Klientifisering og generaliserte forestillinger om arbeidsaktiveringsløp. In H. Aamodt, E. Dahl, E. Gubrium, M. Haldar & Å. Hermansen (Ed.) Sosialt arbeid og sosialpolitikk samhandling – et svar på velferdsstatens utfordringer? (p. 350-370). Fagbokforlaget. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2464-3076-2019-04-09
Gubrium, E. & Leirvik, M.S. (2021). Taking time seriously: Biographical circumstance and immigrant labour integration experience. Journal of International Migration and Integration. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-021-00830-4
Gubrium, J.F. (2008) Analyzing Narrative Reality. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452234854
Gubrium, J.F. & Buckholdt, D.R. (1977). Toward Maturity. Jossey-Bass.
Gubrium, J.F. & Holstein, J.A. (1995) Life Course Malleability: Biographical Work and Deprivatization, Sociological Inquiry. 65(2), 207–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1995.tb00413.x
Gubrium, J.F. & Järvinen, M. (Ed.). (2013). Turning troubles into problems: Clientization in human services. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203798010Gubrium, J.F. (2008) Analyzing Narrative Reality. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452234854
Gubrium, J.F. & Buckholdt, D.R. (1977). Toward Maturity. Jossey-Bass.
Gubrium, J.F. & Holstein, J.A. (1995) Life Course Malleability: Biographical Work and Deprivatization, Sociological Inquiry. 65(2), 207–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.1995.tb00413.x
Gubrium, J.F. & Järvinen, M. (Ed.). (2013). Turning troubles into problems: Clientization in human services. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203798010
Hansen, H.C. (2020). From problems to barriers: A bottom-up perspective on the institutional framing of a labour activation program. Social Policy & Society, 19 (1), 75-87. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746419000241
Hansen, H.C. (2019). Institutional paradoxes in Norwegian labour activation. In R. Lund & A.C. Nielsen (Eds.) Institutional ethnography in the Nordic region, Oxon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429019999-12
Hansen, H.C. & Natland, S. (2017). The working relationship between social worker and service user in an activation policy context. Nordic Social Work Research, 7(2), 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2016.1221850
Holgersen, G. (2017). Arbeidsavklaringspenger: om varighet, forlengelse og forholdet tiluføretrygden. Tidsskrift for erstatningsrett, forsikringsrett og trygderett, 14(3-4), 204–240. https://doi.org/10.18261/issn.2464-3378-2017-03-04-03
Lundberg, K. (2012). Uforutsigbare relasjoner. Brukererfaringer, NAV-reformen og levd liv [PhD-thesis]. University of Bergen.
McIntosh, I. & Wright, S. (2019). Exploring what the notion of lived experience might offer for social policy analysis. Journal of Social Policy, 48(3), 449-467. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047279418000570
Mik-Meyer, N. (2012). Den forstående læge og evidenssøgende socialrådgiver: Rollebytte i dagens velfærdsstat. In M. Järvinen & N. Mik-Meyer, N. (Ed.) At skabe en professionel: Ansvar og autonomi i velfærdsstaten. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Møller, M. Ø. (2012). Socialrådgiverrollen under aktiveringspolitikken. In M. Järvinen & N. Mik-Meyer (Ed.), At skabe en professionel: Ansvar og autonomi i velfærdsstaten (s. 165-187). København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.
Norwegian Ministry of Labour and Inclusion (2006–2007a). Work, Welfare and Inclusion, Parliamentary Report 9. Ministry of Labour and Inclusion
Norwegian Ministry of Labour and Inclusion (2006–2007b). Concerning the Act Changes to the Social Welfare Services Law and Individual Other Acts, Parliamentary Proposition 70. Ministry of Labour and Inclusion.
Norwegian Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs (2004-2005). New Labour and Welfare Administration. Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare.
Norwegian Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs (2011). Regulations Concerning Qualification Program and Qualification Benefit. Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare.
Norwegian Ministry of Labour and Social Affairs (2012) Directive 35 Concerning the Social Services Act. Ministry of Labour and Social Welfare.
Scott, J. (1992). ‘Experience’. In J. Butler & J. W. Scott (Ed.) Feminists Theorize the Political. Routledge.
Solvang, I. (2017). Discretionary approaches to social workers’ personalization of activation services to long-term welfare recipients. European Journal of Social Work, 20(4), 536-547. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2016.1188777
Stake, R.E. (1995). The Art of Case Study Research. Sage.
Tavory, I. (2018). Between situations: Anticipation, rhythms, and the theory of interaction. Sociological Theory, 36(2), 117-133. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275118777007
Valsiner, J. & Winegar, L. (1992). Introduction: A cultural-historical context for ‘social context’. In J. Valsiner & L. Winegar (Ed.) Children’s development within social context. Volume 1: Metatherory and Theory. Laurence Erlbaum Associates.
van Berkel, R. & Knies, E. (2018). The frontline delivery of activation: Workers’ preferences and their antecedents. European Journal of Social Work, 21(4), 602–615. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2017.1297774
Yin, R.K. (2009). Case Study Research, Design and Methods. Sage Publications