The use of vignettes in an international comparative social work research
In-practice and on-practice reflections on practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31265/jcsw.v18i2.548Keywords:
comparative, social work, vignette, focus group, qualitative methods, reflection on practicesAbstract
The aim of this article is to reflect on the strengths and challenges in qualitative comparative research on personal social services. The specific methodological approach that these reflections emerge from is the application of case vignettes in focus group interviews with social workers, working in different welfare regimes.
We describe the process of vignette construction and implementation in focus group interviews, and relate this to findings in a large international project with researchers and data from Chile, Mexico, Norway, Sweden, Lithuania, Bulgaria, Ireland and the UK.
Findings reveal that some globally spread professional norms prevail when they are applied locally, while others are more formed through welfare systems with strong contextual norms and legal and socio-economic barriers. Furthermore, the project showed that to use case vignettes and focus groups, in order to compare ‘social work’ in its totality between countries, is really difficult. It appears more fruitful to use such research methods to compare subsectors and sub-disciplines instead of social work as a whole. The strength of the data retrieved from the study is that it makes it possible to separate information on actual practice from information on principles and system norms, thus providing in-practice and on-practice reflections.
References
Agyris, C. & Schön, D. A. (1989). Theory in practice. Increasing professional effectiveness. Jossey Bass Publishers.
Dominelli, L. (2014). Internationalizing professional practices: The place of social work in the international arena. International Social Work, 57(3), 258-267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872814522671
Erfanian, F., Latifnejad Roudsari, R., Heydari, A. & Noghani Dokht Bahmani, M. (2020). A Narrative on the Use of Vignette: Its Advantages and Drawbacks. Journal of Midwifery and Reproductive Health, 8(2), 2134-2145.
Finch, J. (1987). The vignette technique in survey research. Sociology, 21(1), 105-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038587021001008
Forrester, D., McCambridge, J., Waissbein, C. & Rollnick, S. (2008). How do child and family social workers talk to parents about child welfare concerns?. Child Abuse Review: Journal of the British Association for the Study and Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect, 17(1), 23-35. https://doi.org/10.1002/car.981
Hantrais, L. (2004). Family policy matters. Responding to family change in Europe. Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1t893wm.11
Jenkins, N., Bloor, M., Fischer, J., Berney, L. & Neale, J. (2010). Putting it in context: The use of vignettes in qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Research, 10(2), 175-198. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109356737
Killick, C. & Taylor, B. J. (2012). Judgements of social care professionals on elder abuse referrals: A factorial survey. British Journal of Social Work, 42(5), 814-832. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr109
Koskinen, J. (2019). Constructing the Organizational Field of Social Work Education through Interpretations of the Global Standards (Master's thesis, Itä-Suomen yliopisto).
Križ, K. & Skivenes, M. (2013). Systemic differences in views on risk: A comparative case vignette study of risk assessment in England, Norway and the United States (California). Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 1862-1870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2013.09.001
Krueger, R. A. & Casey M. (2014). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
Lee, C. J. & Goh, E. C. (2020). Using vignettes as a ‘safe space ’for low-income children to discuss sensitive topics in social work assessment. Children and Youth Services Review, 111, 104882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104882
Nygren, L., White, S. & Ellingsen, I. T. (2018). Investigating welfare regime typologies: Paradoxes, pitfalls and potentialities in comparative social work research. Social Policy and Society, 17(4), 665-677. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746418000167
Nygren, L. & Oltedal, S. (2015). Constructing a vignette for qualitative comparative family research. Journal of Comparative Social Work, 10(1), 73-76. https://doi.org/10.31265/jcsw.v10i1.123
Oltedal, S. & Nygren, L. (2019). Public and private families. A study of children`s and parent`s position in Chile, England, Lithuania and Norway. Journal of comparative social work, 14(1), 115–140. https://doi.org/10.31265/jcsw.v14i1.235
Przeperski, J. & Taylor, B. (2022). Cooperation in child welfare decision making: Qualitative vignette study. Child Care in practice, 28(2), 137-152. https://doi.org/10.1080/13575279.2019.1701412
Sampson, H. & Johannessen, I. A. (2020). Turning on the tap: The benefits of using ‘real-life’ vignettes in qualitative research interviews. Qualitative Research, 20(1), 56-72. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794118816618
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York: Basic Books.
Sipilä, J. (Ed.) (2019). Social care services: The key to the Scandinavian welfare model. Abingdon: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429437519
Smithson, J. (2000). Using and analysing focus groups: Limitations and possibilities. Social Research Methodology, 3(2), 103-119.
Steckley, L. (2012). Touch, physical restraint and therapeutic containment in residential child care. British Journal of Social Work, 42(3), 537-555. https://doi.org/10.1080/136455700405172
Stokes, J. & Schmidt, G. (2011). Race, poverty and child protection decision making. British Journal of Social Work, 41(6), 1105-1121. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcr009
Studsrød, I., Ellingsen, I. T., Muñoz, C. E. G. & Mancinas, S. E. (2018). Conceptualisations of Family and Social Work Family Practice in Chile, Mexico and Norway. Social Policy and Society: A Journal of the Social Policy Association, 17(4), 637-649. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746418000234
Trygged, S. (2010). Balancing the global and the local: Some normative reflections on international social work. International Social Work, 53(5), 644-655. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872810371204
Wilks, T. (2004). The use of vignettes in qualitative research into social work values. Qualitative social work, 3(1), 78-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325004041133
Wollmann, H., Koprić, I. & Marcou, G. (2016). Public and social services in Europe: From public and municipal to private sector provision. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-57499-2
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Siv Oltedal, Lennart Nygren
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.